Philosophical Interpretations Matter

Autores
Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Bezerra, Edson Vinicius; Da Re, Bruno
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about some philosophical aspects of paraconsistent logics. The focus of this controversy has been on whether the notion of philosophical interpretation of a logic is separable or independent from the notion of application of a logic. The concept of application of a logic, or applied logic, comes from Priest (2005). Given a purely technical system, one can apply it to different domains, such as computer science, programming, formal linguistics, electric circuits, neural networks, control systems, reasoning, etc. On the other hand, Barrio (2018) and Barrio and Da Ré (2018) have argued that there is a third dimension of a logic that consists in its philosophical interpretation. This aspect is related to some intended meaning of the logical constants and the consequence relation of the pure system. In this sense, while Barrio and Da Ré have argued that, at least in some contexts, the concept of philosophical interpretation has an explanatory role, Arenhart (2022) has claimed that this concept can be reduced to the notion of application. In this article, we will show that the philosophical interpretation of a logic has a crucial role in the usual stances of logicians and philosophers, which can and must be distinguished from the application of the system. We will focus on paraconsistent logics as study cases for our points since the debate has developed almost entirely around these systems. However, most of our claims can be applied to any logical system. In fact, throughout the paper, we will also provide examples using non-paraconsistent logics.
Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Bezerra, Edson Vinicius. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Da Re, Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS
PARACONSISTENCY
SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGICS
PURE VS APPLIED LOGICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291046
Acceder
id CONICETDig_21f685ea448d388dab9886a7f8c64103
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291046
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Philosophical Interpretations MatterBarrio, Eduardo AlejandroBezerra, Edson ViniciusDa Re, BrunoPHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONSPARACONSISTENCYSUBSTRUCTURAL LOGICSPURE VS APPLIED LOGICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about some philosophical aspects of paraconsistent logics. The focus of this controversy has been on whether the notion of philosophical interpretation of a logic is separable or independent from the notion of application of a logic. The concept of application of a logic, or applied logic, comes from Priest (2005). Given a purely technical system, one can apply it to different domains, such as computer science, programming, formal linguistics, electric circuits, neural networks, control systems, reasoning, etc. On the other hand, Barrio (2018) and Barrio and Da Ré (2018) have argued that there is a third dimension of a logic that consists in its philosophical interpretation. This aspect is related to some intended meaning of the logical constants and the consequence relation of the pure system. In this sense, while Barrio and Da Ré have argued that, at least in some contexts, the concept of philosophical interpretation has an explanatory role, Arenhart (2022) has claimed that this concept can be reduced to the notion of application. In this article, we will show that the philosophical interpretation of a logic has a crucial role in the usual stances of logicians and philosophers, which can and must be distinguished from the application of the system. We will focus on paraconsistent logics as study cases for our points since the debate has developed almost entirely around these systems. However, most of our claims can be applied to any logical system. In fact, throughout the paper, we will also provide examples using non-paraconsistent logics.Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Bezerra, Edson Vinicius. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Da Re, Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina2025-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/291046Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Bezerra, Edson Vinicius; Da Re, Bruno; Philosophical Interpretations Matter; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia: an international journal of epistemology; 29; 2; 17-7-2025; 203-2251808-1711CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/107900info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/1808-1711.2025.e107900info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-08-25T15:37:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291046instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-08-25 15:37:51.099CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Philosophical Interpretations Matter
title Philosophical Interpretations Matter
spellingShingle Philosophical Interpretations Matter
Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS
PARACONSISTENCY
SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGICS
PURE VS APPLIED LOGICS
title_short Philosophical Interpretations Matter
title_full Philosophical Interpretations Matter
title_fullStr Philosophical Interpretations Matter
title_full_unstemmed Philosophical Interpretations Matter
title_sort Philosophical Interpretations Matter
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
Bezerra, Edson Vinicius
Da Re, Bruno
author Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
author_facet Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro
Bezerra, Edson Vinicius
Da Re, Bruno
author_role author
author2 Bezerra, Edson Vinicius
Da Re, Bruno
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS
PARACONSISTENCY
SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGICS
PURE VS APPLIED LOGICS
topic PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS
PARACONSISTENCY
SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGICS
PURE VS APPLIED LOGICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about some philosophical aspects of paraconsistent logics. The focus of this controversy has been on whether the notion of philosophical interpretation of a logic is separable or independent from the notion of application of a logic. The concept of application of a logic, or applied logic, comes from Priest (2005). Given a purely technical system, one can apply it to different domains, such as computer science, programming, formal linguistics, electric circuits, neural networks, control systems, reasoning, etc. On the other hand, Barrio (2018) and Barrio and Da Ré (2018) have argued that there is a third dimension of a logic that consists in its philosophical interpretation. This aspect is related to some intended meaning of the logical constants and the consequence relation of the pure system. In this sense, while Barrio and Da Ré have argued that, at least in some contexts, the concept of philosophical interpretation has an explanatory role, Arenhart (2022) has claimed that this concept can be reduced to the notion of application. In this article, we will show that the philosophical interpretation of a logic has a crucial role in the usual stances of logicians and philosophers, which can and must be distinguished from the application of the system. We will focus on paraconsistent logics as study cases for our points since the debate has developed almost entirely around these systems. However, most of our claims can be applied to any logical system. In fact, throughout the paper, we will also provide examples using non-paraconsistent logics.
Fil: Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Bezerra, Edson Vinicius. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Da Re, Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about some philosophical aspects of paraconsistent logics. The focus of this controversy has been on whether the notion of philosophical interpretation of a logic is separable or independent from the notion of application of a logic. The concept of application of a logic, or applied logic, comes from Priest (2005). Given a purely technical system, one can apply it to different domains, such as computer science, programming, formal linguistics, electric circuits, neural networks, control systems, reasoning, etc. On the other hand, Barrio (2018) and Barrio and Da Ré (2018) have argued that there is a third dimension of a logic that consists in its philosophical interpretation. This aspect is related to some intended meaning of the logical constants and the consequence relation of the pure system. In this sense, while Barrio and Da Ré have argued that, at least in some contexts, the concept of philosophical interpretation has an explanatory role, Arenhart (2022) has claimed that this concept can be reduced to the notion of application. In this article, we will show that the philosophical interpretation of a logic has a crucial role in the usual stances of logicians and philosophers, which can and must be distinguished from the application of the system. We will focus on paraconsistent logics as study cases for our points since the debate has developed almost entirely around these systems. However, most of our claims can be applied to any logical system. In fact, throughout the paper, we will also provide examples using non-paraconsistent logics.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-07-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/291046
Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Bezerra, Edson Vinicius; Da Re, Bruno; Philosophical Interpretations Matter; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia: an international journal of epistemology; 29; 2; 17-7-2025; 203-225
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/291046
identifier_str_mv Barrio, Eduardo Alejandro; Bezerra, Edson Vinicius; Da Re, Bruno; Philosophical Interpretations Matter; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia: an international journal of epistemology; 29; 2; 17-7-2025; 203-225
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/107900
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/1808-1711.2025.e107900
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1874775581203103744
score 13.24418

Publicaciones similares