Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly
- Autores
- Carlucci, Renzo; Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús
- Año de publicación
- 2026
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to design and optimize small molecules. However, most current workflows remain centered on drug-candidate objectives, such as potency, ADMET, and drug-likeness, rather than on the distinct requirements of small-molecule chemical probes. We argue that this distinction matters for drug discovery because chemical probes are essential for target validation and mechanistic interrogation. Their value, however, depends on stringent selectivity, demonstrable target engagement in relevant biological contexts, fit-for-purpose concentration windows, and appropriate control compounds that support causal interpretation. These requirements make probe discovery a fundamentally different optimization problem from conventional drug design. Here, we examine how contemporary AI methods (including property prediction, multi-target modeling, generative optimization, and synthesis-aware design) can contribute to chemical probe discovery while highlighting why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly. We further discuss emerging applications in fluorescent and covalent probe design, where photophysical behavior, signal detectability under biologically relevant conditions, intrinsic reactivity, and site selectivity introduce modality-specific constraints that are poorly captured by conventional datasets and benchmarks. We propose that meaningful progress will require probe-native datasets, probe-centric evaluation frameworks, and closed-loop experimental validation strategies that treat probe success as a function of the molecule, evidence, and context of use.
Fil: Carlucci, Renzo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencas Exactas. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús. University College London; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
CHEMICAL PROBE DESIGN
COVALENT PROBES
FLUORESCENT PROBES
GENERATIVE MOLECULAR DESIGN
MACHINE LEARNING
TARGET VALIDATION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/289979
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_6650c6fbe6e156ab357a7f7fedc91003 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/289979 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanlyCarlucci, RenzoPorta, Exequiel Oscar JesúsARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCECHEMICAL PROBE DESIGNCOVALENT PROBESFLUORESCENT PROBESGENERATIVE MOLECULAR DESIGNMACHINE LEARNINGTARGET VALIDATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to design and optimize small molecules. However, most current workflows remain centered on drug-candidate objectives, such as potency, ADMET, and drug-likeness, rather than on the distinct requirements of small-molecule chemical probes. We argue that this distinction matters for drug discovery because chemical probes are essential for target validation and mechanistic interrogation. Their value, however, depends on stringent selectivity, demonstrable target engagement in relevant biological contexts, fit-for-purpose concentration windows, and appropriate control compounds that support causal interpretation. These requirements make probe discovery a fundamentally different optimization problem from conventional drug design. Here, we examine how contemporary AI methods (including property prediction, multi-target modeling, generative optimization, and synthesis-aware design) can contribute to chemical probe discovery while highlighting why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly. We further discuss emerging applications in fluorescent and covalent probe design, where photophysical behavior, signal detectability under biologically relevant conditions, intrinsic reactivity, and site selectivity introduce modality-specific constraints that are poorly captured by conventional datasets and benchmarks. We propose that meaningful progress will require probe-native datasets, probe-centric evaluation frameworks, and closed-loop experimental validation strategies that treat probe success as a function of the molecule, evidence, and context of use.Fil: Carlucci, Renzo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencas Exactas. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús. University College London; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFrontiers Media2026-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/289979Carlucci, Renzo; Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús; Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Drug Discovery; 6; 5-2026; 1-102674-0338CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fddsv.2026.1836983/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fddsv.2026.1836983info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-08-25T15:04:10Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/289979instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-08-25 15:04:10.848CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| title |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| spellingShingle |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly Carlucci, Renzo ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHEMICAL PROBE DESIGN COVALENT PROBES FLUORESCENT PROBES GENERATIVE MOLECULAR DESIGN MACHINE LEARNING TARGET VALIDATION |
| title_short |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| title_full |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| title_fullStr |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| title_sort |
Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Carlucci, Renzo Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús |
| author |
Carlucci, Renzo |
| author_facet |
Carlucci, Renzo Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHEMICAL PROBE DESIGN COVALENT PROBES FLUORESCENT PROBES GENERATIVE MOLECULAR DESIGN MACHINE LEARNING TARGET VALIDATION |
| topic |
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHEMICAL PROBE DESIGN COVALENT PROBES FLUORESCENT PROBES GENERATIVE MOLECULAR DESIGN MACHINE LEARNING TARGET VALIDATION |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to design and optimize small molecules. However, most current workflows remain centered on drug-candidate objectives, such as potency, ADMET, and drug-likeness, rather than on the distinct requirements of small-molecule chemical probes. We argue that this distinction matters for drug discovery because chemical probes are essential for target validation and mechanistic interrogation. Their value, however, depends on stringent selectivity, demonstrable target engagement in relevant biological contexts, fit-for-purpose concentration windows, and appropriate control compounds that support causal interpretation. These requirements make probe discovery a fundamentally different optimization problem from conventional drug design. Here, we examine how contemporary AI methods (including property prediction, multi-target modeling, generative optimization, and synthesis-aware design) can contribute to chemical probe discovery while highlighting why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly. We further discuss emerging applications in fluorescent and covalent probe design, where photophysical behavior, signal detectability under biologically relevant conditions, intrinsic reactivity, and site selectivity introduce modality-specific constraints that are poorly captured by conventional datasets and benchmarks. We propose that meaningful progress will require probe-native datasets, probe-centric evaluation frameworks, and closed-loop experimental validation strategies that treat probe success as a function of the molecule, evidence, and context of use. Fil: Carlucci, Renzo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencas Exactas. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Bioactivos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina Fil: Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús. University College London; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
| description |
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to design and optimize small molecules. However, most current workflows remain centered on drug-candidate objectives, such as potency, ADMET, and drug-likeness, rather than on the distinct requirements of small-molecule chemical probes. We argue that this distinction matters for drug discovery because chemical probes are essential for target validation and mechanistic interrogation. Their value, however, depends on stringent selectivity, demonstrable target engagement in relevant biological contexts, fit-for-purpose concentration windows, and appropriate control compounds that support causal interpretation. These requirements make probe discovery a fundamentally different optimization problem from conventional drug design. Here, we examine how contemporary AI methods (including property prediction, multi-target modeling, generative optimization, and synthesis-aware design) can contribute to chemical probe discovery while highlighting why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly. We further discuss emerging applications in fluorescent and covalent probe design, where photophysical behavior, signal detectability under biologically relevant conditions, intrinsic reactivity, and site selectivity introduce modality-specific constraints that are poorly captured by conventional datasets and benchmarks. We propose that meaningful progress will require probe-native datasets, probe-centric evaluation frameworks, and closed-loop experimental validation strategies that treat probe success as a function of the molecule, evidence, and context of use. |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2026-05 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/289979 Carlucci, Renzo; Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús; Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Drug Discovery; 6; 5-2026; 1-10 2674-0338 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/289979 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Carlucci, Renzo; Porta, Exequiel Oscar Jesús; Artificial intelligence for small-molecule chemical probe design: why drug-centric models may not transfer cleanly; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Drug Discovery; 6; 5-2026; 1-10 2674-0338 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fddsv.2026.1836983/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fddsv.2026.1836983 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1874775097756090368 |
| score |
13.24418 |