The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation

Autores
Penelas, Federico Carlos
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Some years ago, Robert Brandom transformed the question “Who are we?” that had guided MIE into an exploration of the problem of what form of good life political institutions ought to promote. So, the new political question is: What is the best form of life to develop, given the kind of we that we are? In this article, I follow the thread of that aspect of Brandom’s work to highlight affinities and divergences with Rorty’s ironist-liberal project. This will result, on the one hand, in identifying certain blind spots in Brandom’s approach to the phenomenon of language and, on the other, in defending what I will call the “right to irony,” which will be presented as a condition for exercising the “right to be known” recently developed by JenniferLackey.
Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Materia
BRANDOM
RORTY
IRONISM
EPISTEMIC REPARATIONS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/290873
Acceder
id CONICETDig_cea8c0973ec378ace72f938b3c6f5d10
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/290873
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in ConversationPenelas, Federico CarlosBRANDOMRORTYIRONISMEPISTEMIC REPARATIONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Some years ago, Robert Brandom transformed the question “Who are we?” that had guided MIE into an exploration of the problem of what form of good life political institutions ought to promote. So, the new political question is: What is the best form of life to develop, given the kind of we that we are? In this article, I follow the thread of that aspect of Brandom’s work to highlight affinities and divergences with Rorty’s ironist-liberal project. This will result, on the one hand, in identifying certain blind spots in Brandom’s approach to the phenomenon of language and, on the other, in defending what I will call the “right to irony,” which will be presented as a condition for exercising the “right to be known” recently developed by JenniferLackey.Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaAssociazione Culturale Pragma2025-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/290873Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation; Associazione Culturale Pragma; European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy; 17; 2; 16-12-2025; 1-142036-4091CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/5459info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/15d8ninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-08-25T14:31:06Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/290873instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-08-25 14:31:06.531CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
title The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
spellingShingle The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
Penelas, Federico Carlos
BRANDOM
RORTY
IRONISM
EPISTEMIC REPARATIONS
title_short The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
title_full The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
title_fullStr The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
title_full_unstemmed The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
title_sort The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Penelas, Federico Carlos
author Penelas, Federico Carlos
author_facet Penelas, Federico Carlos
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BRANDOM
RORTY
IRONISM
EPISTEMIC REPARATIONS
topic BRANDOM
RORTY
IRONISM
EPISTEMIC REPARATIONS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Some years ago, Robert Brandom transformed the question “Who are we?” that had guided MIE into an exploration of the problem of what form of good life political institutions ought to promote. So, the new political question is: What is the best form of life to develop, given the kind of we that we are? In this article, I follow the thread of that aspect of Brandom’s work to highlight affinities and divergences with Rorty’s ironist-liberal project. This will result, on the one hand, in identifying certain blind spots in Brandom’s approach to the phenomenon of language and, on the other, in defending what I will call the “right to irony,” which will be presented as a condition for exercising the “right to be known” recently developed by JenniferLackey.
Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
description Some years ago, Robert Brandom transformed the question “Who are we?” that had guided MIE into an exploration of the problem of what form of good life political institutions ought to promote. So, the new political question is: What is the best form of life to develop, given the kind of we that we are? In this article, I follow the thread of that aspect of Brandom’s work to highlight affinities and divergences with Rorty’s ironist-liberal project. This will result, on the one hand, in identifying certain blind spots in Brandom’s approach to the phenomenon of language and, on the other, in defending what I will call the “right to irony,” which will be presented as a condition for exercising the “right to be known” recently developed by JenniferLackey.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/290873
Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation; Associazione Culturale Pragma; European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy; 17; 2; 16-12-2025; 1-14
2036-4091
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/290873
identifier_str_mv Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Right to Irony: Brandom, Rorty and Lackey in Conversation; Associazione Culturale Pragma; European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy; 17; 2; 16-12-2025; 1-14
2036-4091
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/5459
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/15d8n
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associazione Culturale Pragma
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associazione Culturale Pragma
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1874774052141268992
score 13.265058

Publicaciones similares