Normas, razones y motivaciones

Autores
Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The main objective of this paper is to analyze how Moreso examines the connection between reasons, norms, and motivation of behavior. To a large extent, Moreso's approach, outlined in various chapters in his book Lo normativo: variedades y variaciones, depends on the acceptance of the Kantian principle ‘ought implies can’. This principle is widely accepted in the logic of norms, though in the field of law, it generates philosophically controversial consequences. For example, it follows that an incoherent set of norms could not exist within the same normative corpus. An independent yet intrinsically connected argument was developed by Ricardo Caracciolo, suggesting that from certain intuitive theses regarding norms, the motivation behind behavior, and reasons for action, it would follow that we are not obligated to perform actions for which we lack the desire to undertake. In this paper, I attempt to show that Moreso's arguments for addressing this dilemma proposed by Caracciolo need further development.
Fil: Navarro, Pablo Eugenio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad de Alicante; España
Materia
Internal reasons
External reasons
Normative conflicts
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291125
Acceder
id CONICETDig_ed7c648f56d710e97f7fe4ebb0f3c2a7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291125
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Normas, razones y motivacionesNorms, reasons, and motivationNavarro, Pablo EugenioInternal reasonsExternal reasonsNormative conflictshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The main objective of this paper is to analyze how Moreso examines the connection between reasons, norms, and motivation of behavior. To a large extent, Moreso's approach, outlined in various chapters in his book Lo normativo: variedades y variaciones, depends on the acceptance of the Kantian principle ‘ought implies can’. This principle is widely accepted in the logic of norms, though in the field of law, it generates philosophically controversial consequences. For example, it follows that an incoherent set of norms could not exist within the same normative corpus. An independent yet intrinsically connected argument was developed by Ricardo Caracciolo, suggesting that from certain intuitive theses regarding norms, the motivation behind behavior, and reasons for action, it would follow that we are not obligated to perform actions for which we lack the desire to undertake. In this paper, I attempt to show that Moreso's arguments for addressing this dilemma proposed by Caracciolo need further development.Fil: Navarro, Pablo Eugenio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad de Alicante; EspañaUniversità degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia2025-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/291125Navarro, Pablo Eugenio; Normas, razones y motivaciones; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica e Politica; 27; 2; 12-2025; 383-3921825-5167CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.13137/1825-5167/37517info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-08-25T14:58:54Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/291125instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-08-25 14:58:54.512CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Normas, razones y motivaciones
Norms, reasons, and motivation
title Normas, razones y motivaciones
spellingShingle Normas, razones y motivaciones
Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
Internal reasons
External reasons
Normative conflicts
title_short Normas, razones y motivaciones
title_full Normas, razones y motivaciones
title_fullStr Normas, razones y motivaciones
title_full_unstemmed Normas, razones y motivaciones
title_sort Normas, razones y motivaciones
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
author Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
author_facet Navarro, Pablo Eugenio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Internal reasons
External reasons
Normative conflicts
topic Internal reasons
External reasons
Normative conflicts
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The main objective of this paper is to analyze how Moreso examines the connection between reasons, norms, and motivation of behavior. To a large extent, Moreso's approach, outlined in various chapters in his book Lo normativo: variedades y variaciones, depends on the acceptance of the Kantian principle ‘ought implies can’. This principle is widely accepted in the logic of norms, though in the field of law, it generates philosophically controversial consequences. For example, it follows that an incoherent set of norms could not exist within the same normative corpus. An independent yet intrinsically connected argument was developed by Ricardo Caracciolo, suggesting that from certain intuitive theses regarding norms, the motivation behind behavior, and reasons for action, it would follow that we are not obligated to perform actions for which we lack the desire to undertake. In this paper, I attempt to show that Moreso's arguments for addressing this dilemma proposed by Caracciolo need further development.
Fil: Navarro, Pablo Eugenio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Estudios sobre Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad; Argentina. Universidad de Alicante; España
description The main objective of this paper is to analyze how Moreso examines the connection between reasons, norms, and motivation of behavior. To a large extent, Moreso's approach, outlined in various chapters in his book Lo normativo: variedades y variaciones, depends on the acceptance of the Kantian principle ‘ought implies can’. This principle is widely accepted in the logic of norms, though in the field of law, it generates philosophically controversial consequences. For example, it follows that an incoherent set of norms could not exist within the same normative corpus. An independent yet intrinsically connected argument was developed by Ricardo Caracciolo, suggesting that from certain intuitive theses regarding norms, the motivation behind behavior, and reasons for action, it would follow that we are not obligated to perform actions for which we lack the desire to undertake. In this paper, I attempt to show that Moreso's arguments for addressing this dilemma proposed by Caracciolo need further development.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/291125
Navarro, Pablo Eugenio; Normas, razones y motivaciones; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica e Politica; 27; 2; 12-2025; 383-392
1825-5167
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/291125
identifier_str_mv Navarro, Pablo Eugenio; Normas, razones y motivaciones; Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia; Etica e Politica; 27; 2; 12-2025; 383-392
1825-5167
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.13137/1825-5167/37517
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Università degli studi di Trieste. Dipartimento di Filosofia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1874774969228984320
score 13.24418

Publicaciones similares