Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups
- Autores
- Debandi, Guillermo Oscar; Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz; López García, Guillermo Pablo; Giusti, Romanela; Marcucci, Bruno; Mazzitelli, Emilia; Portela, Jose Antonio; Chaar, Javier Emilio; Del Barrio, Lucia; Gonzalez, Marcela Fabiana; Alemanno, Valeria
- Año de publicación
- 2026
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Introduction: Agricultural expansion increasingly replaces natural habitats with crops. Vineyards are spreading into arid natural areas, and because grapevine provides no nectar, flower-visiting insects within them depend largely on the ground cover and on remnants of native vegetation. Aims/Methods: We asked whether flower-visiting assemblages differ between remnant riparian vegetation and the adjacent crop, whether they differ between positions within the crop, and which ground-cover attributes are associated with these differences. In four vineyards we sampled wild bees, wasps and hoverflies in riparian corridors, at vineyard edges and in vineyard interiors over two seasons, and recorded the vegetation of each sampling unit. Richness, abundance and composition were compared using mixed models, coverage-standardised diversity and indicator species analysis. Results: Assemblages differed between corridors and the crop, but not between vineyard edges and interiors. Bee and wasp richness and abundance were higher in corridors than at either vineyard position, and nine species occurred almost exclusively there, whereas none was restricted to vineyard interiors. Hoverflies showed the opposite pattern, being more abundant within the vineyard; this group was dominated by a single aphidophagous species accounting for 88% of individuals. Bees and wasps were associated with flowering plant cover and native dicotyledonous richness, and negatively with total vegetation cover; hoverfly abundance was negatively associated with native dicotyledonous richness. Discussion: Riparian corridors act as reservoirs for the native bee and wasp fauna, holding species that scarcely enter the crop. Implications for insect conservation: Preserving remnant riparian vegetation is a prerequisite for sustaining diverse bee and wasp communities in expanding vineyard landscapes. Increasing floral resources and native plant richness in inter-rows complements, but cannot substitute for, conserving these remnants.
EEA Junín
Fil: Debandi, Guillermo Oscar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; Argentina
Fil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; Argentina
Fil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: López García, Guillermo. Actividad privada; Argentina
Fil: Giusti, Romanela. Instituto de Educación Superior (IES) 9010 Rosario Vera Peñaloza; Argentina
Fil: Marcucci, Bruno. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Mazzitelli, Emilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Portela, Jose Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina
Fil: Chaar, Javier Emilio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Agencia de Extensión Rural Guaymallén; Argentina
Fil: Del Barrio, Lucia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: González Luna, Marcela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina
Fil: Alemanno, Valeria. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina - Fuente
- Journal of Insect Conservation 30 : article number 105. (October 2026)
- Materia
-
Viña
Agroecosistemas
Insectos Utiles
Biodiversidad
Vegetación Ripícola
Organismos Nativos
Vineyards
Agroecosystems
Useful Insects
Biodiversity
Riparian Vegetation
Native Organisms
Viñedos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/28263
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_522f8a9ddc336c3e4b1c0f4564071afa |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/28263 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groupsDebandi, Guillermo OscarFruitos, Andrea BeatrizLópez García, Guillermo PabloGiusti, RomanelaMarcucci, BrunoMazzitelli, EmiliaPortela, Jose AntonioChaar, Javier EmilioDel Barrio, LuciaGonzalez, Marcela FabianaAlemanno, ValeriaViñaAgroecosistemasInsectos UtilesBiodiversidadVegetación RipícolaOrganismos NativosVineyardsAgroecosystemsUseful InsectsBiodiversityRiparian VegetationNative OrganismsViñedosIntroduction: Agricultural expansion increasingly replaces natural habitats with crops. Vineyards are spreading into arid natural areas, and because grapevine provides no nectar, flower-visiting insects within them depend largely on the ground cover and on remnants of native vegetation. Aims/Methods: We asked whether flower-visiting assemblages differ between remnant riparian vegetation and the adjacent crop, whether they differ between positions within the crop, and which ground-cover attributes are associated with these differences. In four vineyards we sampled wild bees, wasps and hoverflies in riparian corridors, at vineyard edges and in vineyard interiors over two seasons, and recorded the vegetation of each sampling unit. Richness, abundance and composition were compared using mixed models, coverage-standardised diversity and indicator species analysis. Results: Assemblages differed between corridors and the crop, but not between vineyard edges and interiors. Bee and wasp richness and abundance were higher in corridors than at either vineyard position, and nine species occurred almost exclusively there, whereas none was restricted to vineyard interiors. Hoverflies showed the opposite pattern, being more abundant within the vineyard; this group was dominated by a single aphidophagous species accounting for 88% of individuals. Bees and wasps were associated with flowering plant cover and native dicotyledonous richness, and negatively with total vegetation cover; hoverfly abundance was negatively associated with native dicotyledonous richness. Discussion: Riparian corridors act as reservoirs for the native bee and wasp fauna, holding species that scarcely enter the crop. Implications for insect conservation: Preserving remnant riparian vegetation is a prerequisite for sustaining diverse bee and wasp communities in expanding vineyard landscapes. Increasing floral resources and native plant richness in inter-rows complements, but cannot substitute for, conserving these remnants.EEA JunínFil: Debandi, Guillermo Oscar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; ArgentinaFil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; ArgentinaFil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: López García, Guillermo. Actividad privada; ArgentinaFil: Giusti, Romanela. Instituto de Educación Superior (IES) 9010 Rosario Vera Peñaloza; ArgentinaFil: Marcucci, Bruno. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Mazzitelli, Emilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Portela, Jose Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; ArgentinaFil: Chaar, Javier Emilio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Agencia de Extensión Rural Guaymallén; ArgentinaFil: Del Barrio, Lucia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: González Luna, Marcela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Alemanno, Valeria. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaSpringer2026-10-27T13:01:57Z2026-10-27T13:01:57Z2026-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/28263https://link-hkg.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-01366-638X (print)1572-9753 (online)https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-0Journal of Insect Conservation 30 : article number 105. (October 2026)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I020-001, Desarrollo de criterios para diseño, monitoreo y evaluación de estrategias de intensificación sostenible de agroecosistemas, basadas en múltiples servicios ecosistémicosinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestalesinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2023-PD-L03-I096, Estrategias de restauración, valoración y conservación de la biodiversidad y servicios ecosistemicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2026-11-05T11:51:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/28263instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2026-11-05 11:51:42.533INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| title |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| spellingShingle |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups Debandi, Guillermo Oscar Viña Agroecosistemas Insectos Utiles Biodiversidad Vegetación Ripícola Organismos Nativos Vineyards Agroecosystems Useful Insects Biodiversity Riparian Vegetation Native Organisms Viñedos |
| title_short |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| title_full |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| title_fullStr |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| title_sort |
Riparian corridors structure flower-visiting insect communities in expanding vineyard landscapes, with opposing responses among taxonomic groups |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Debandi, Guillermo Oscar Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz López García, Guillermo Pablo Giusti, Romanela Marcucci, Bruno Mazzitelli, Emilia Portela, Jose Antonio Chaar, Javier Emilio Del Barrio, Lucia Gonzalez, Marcela Fabiana Alemanno, Valeria |
| author |
Debandi, Guillermo Oscar |
| author_facet |
Debandi, Guillermo Oscar Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz López García, Guillermo Pablo Giusti, Romanela Marcucci, Bruno Mazzitelli, Emilia Portela, Jose Antonio Chaar, Javier Emilio Del Barrio, Lucia Gonzalez, Marcela Fabiana Alemanno, Valeria |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz López García, Guillermo Pablo Giusti, Romanela Marcucci, Bruno Mazzitelli, Emilia Portela, Jose Antonio Chaar, Javier Emilio Del Barrio, Lucia Gonzalez, Marcela Fabiana Alemanno, Valeria |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Viña Agroecosistemas Insectos Utiles Biodiversidad Vegetación Ripícola Organismos Nativos Vineyards Agroecosystems Useful Insects Biodiversity Riparian Vegetation Native Organisms Viñedos |
| topic |
Viña Agroecosistemas Insectos Utiles Biodiversidad Vegetación Ripícola Organismos Nativos Vineyards Agroecosystems Useful Insects Biodiversity Riparian Vegetation Native Organisms Viñedos |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Introduction: Agricultural expansion increasingly replaces natural habitats with crops. Vineyards are spreading into arid natural areas, and because grapevine provides no nectar, flower-visiting insects within them depend largely on the ground cover and on remnants of native vegetation. Aims/Methods: We asked whether flower-visiting assemblages differ between remnant riparian vegetation and the adjacent crop, whether they differ between positions within the crop, and which ground-cover attributes are associated with these differences. In four vineyards we sampled wild bees, wasps and hoverflies in riparian corridors, at vineyard edges and in vineyard interiors over two seasons, and recorded the vegetation of each sampling unit. Richness, abundance and composition were compared using mixed models, coverage-standardised diversity and indicator species analysis. Results: Assemblages differed between corridors and the crop, but not between vineyard edges and interiors. Bee and wasp richness and abundance were higher in corridors than at either vineyard position, and nine species occurred almost exclusively there, whereas none was restricted to vineyard interiors. Hoverflies showed the opposite pattern, being more abundant within the vineyard; this group was dominated by a single aphidophagous species accounting for 88% of individuals. Bees and wasps were associated with flowering plant cover and native dicotyledonous richness, and negatively with total vegetation cover; hoverfly abundance was negatively associated with native dicotyledonous richness. Discussion: Riparian corridors act as reservoirs for the native bee and wasp fauna, holding species that scarcely enter the crop. Implications for insect conservation: Preserving remnant riparian vegetation is a prerequisite for sustaining diverse bee and wasp communities in expanding vineyard landscapes. Increasing floral resources and native plant richness in inter-rows complements, but cannot substitute for, conserving these remnants. EEA Junín Fil: Debandi, Guillermo Oscar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; Argentina Fil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junin; Argentina Fil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatriz. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: López García, Guillermo. Actividad privada; Argentina Fil: Giusti, Romanela. Instituto de Educación Superior (IES) 9010 Rosario Vera Peñaloza; Argentina Fil: Marcucci, Bruno. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Mazzitelli, Emilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Portela, Jose Antonio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Consulta; Argentina Fil: Chaar, Javier Emilio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Agencia de Extensión Rural Guaymallén; Argentina Fil: Del Barrio, Lucia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: González Luna, Marcela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Alemanno, Valeria. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina |
| description |
Introduction: Agricultural expansion increasingly replaces natural habitats with crops. Vineyards are spreading into arid natural areas, and because grapevine provides no nectar, flower-visiting insects within them depend largely on the ground cover and on remnants of native vegetation. Aims/Methods: We asked whether flower-visiting assemblages differ between remnant riparian vegetation and the adjacent crop, whether they differ between positions within the crop, and which ground-cover attributes are associated with these differences. In four vineyards we sampled wild bees, wasps and hoverflies in riparian corridors, at vineyard edges and in vineyard interiors over two seasons, and recorded the vegetation of each sampling unit. Richness, abundance and composition were compared using mixed models, coverage-standardised diversity and indicator species analysis. Results: Assemblages differed between corridors and the crop, but not between vineyard edges and interiors. Bee and wasp richness and abundance were higher in corridors than at either vineyard position, and nine species occurred almost exclusively there, whereas none was restricted to vineyard interiors. Hoverflies showed the opposite pattern, being more abundant within the vineyard; this group was dominated by a single aphidophagous species accounting for 88% of individuals. Bees and wasps were associated with flowering plant cover and native dicotyledonous richness, and negatively with total vegetation cover; hoverfly abundance was negatively associated with native dicotyledonous richness. Discussion: Riparian corridors act as reservoirs for the native bee and wasp fauna, holding species that scarcely enter the crop. Implications for insect conservation: Preserving remnant riparian vegetation is a prerequisite for sustaining diverse bee and wasp communities in expanding vineyard landscapes. Increasing floral resources and native plant richness in inter-rows complements, but cannot substitute for, conserving these remnants. |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2026-10-27T13:01:57Z 2026-10-27T13:01:57Z 2026-10 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/28263 https://link-hkg.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-0 1366-638X (print) 1572-9753 (online) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-0 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/28263 https://link-hkg.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-026-00838-0 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1366-638X (print) 1572-9753 (online) |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I020-001, Desarrollo de criterios para diseño, monitoreo y evaluación de estrategias de intensificación sostenible de agroecosistemas, basadas en múltiples servicios ecosistémicos info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestales info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2023-PD-L03-I096, Estrategias de restauración, valoración y conservación de la biodiversidad y servicios ecosistemicos |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Insect Conservation 30 : article number 105. (October 2026) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1881032529761271808 |
| score |
13.334379 |