La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles...

Autores
Piantanida, Fernando Martín
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
tesis doctoral
Estado
versión aceptada
Colaborador/a o director/a de tesis
Gonzales, Antonio
García Mac Gaw, Carlos Guillermo
Descripción
The participation of free men in the movements led by rebellious slaves sets a complex problem in terms of the importance of the freedom/slavery antinomy in the thinking of the ancient Greeks and Romans. The chattelslaves, defined as things, were represented as foreigners. The slaves served as the 'Others' against which all citizens, from the rich slave owners to the poor artisans and peasants, defined themselves as a unity. The contrast between the slave and the citizen made it possible to shade, from an ideological point of view, the relations of exploitation and the differences of wealth between the citizens. This tended to suppress the social conflict between them. Despite the significant legal and political differences between the free and the enslaved, and the ideological representation that was made of it, the sources narrate that some free men not only did not repress the rebel slaves in the great servile revolts, in solidarity with their rich fellow citizens, but they plundered these last ones or joined the fugitives. In the present work, we study the participation of impoverished free men (aporoi) in the laterepublican servile wars and the relationship they established with the rebel slaves, a problem that has sometimes been neglected by the historiography or only partially treated. Some historiographical currents neglected the participation of the aporoi in the servile wars, and others overestimate it. In opposition, we revalue a line of investigation that, on the one hand, maintains the servile nature of the insurrections, since, the main role was apparently of the rebel slaves, but on the other hand affirms that the participation of free men was an important element. We believe that this point of view is the most appropriate for the testimonies of the sources and we contribute elements to rethink it. Those elements include: to focus the study within the framework of the classic democratic imaginary that will tend to promote the citizen solidarity facing the servile threat; to analyse each revolt individually to evaluate the relationship between the subaltern sectors; and understand the participation of the aporoi, either its parallel rebellion or its inflow to the rebel ranks, as the symptom of tensions within the citizen body that can be defined in terms of stáseis (civil discords), of which the servile revolts nurtured from the beginning. Therefore, the participation of the aporoi is a factor, among others, that helped the growth of the servile revolts. In the case of the first Sicilian revolt and the revolt of Spartacus, we maintain the existence of a conjunctural alliance between the rebellious slaves and the aporoi. In contrast, in the second Sicilian revolt, we defend the interpretative line that supports the idea that there was no relationship between the two groups, but rather two parallel revolts: the free poor simply took advantage of the opportunity in the servile revolt to plunder the properties of the rich. Our work attempts to nuance the most rigid theoretical views that affirm the absolute incommunicability between plebeians and slaves. There were occasions, albeit unusual, where the abyss that separated the free man from the slave did not seem to be so great, at least not to the aporoi, who ignored the imaginary that pitted them against the dishonored social dead. The servile wars were one of those cases.
Fil: Piantanida, Fernando Martín. Universite de Bourgogne / Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales.
Materia
Historia
Servile wars
Rebel slaves
The impoverished free men
Participation
Ideology
Civil discords
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
OAI Identificador
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jte2735
Acceder
id MemAca_5d8fc394a4d7f61dd225b7c2fd89c51c
oai_identifier_str oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jte2735
network_acronym_str MemAca
repository_id_str 1341
network_name_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
spelling La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civilesThe participation of the aporoi in the late-republican servile wars and their relationship with the rebel slaves. Dominant ideology, popular praxis and civil discordsPiantanida, Fernando MartínHistoriaServile warsRebel slavesThe impoverished free menParticipationIdeologyCivil discordsThe participation of free men in the movements led by rebellious slaves sets a complex problem in terms of the importance of the freedom/slavery antinomy in the thinking of the ancient Greeks and Romans. The chattelslaves, defined as things, were represented as foreigners. The slaves served as the 'Others' against which all citizens, from the rich slave owners to the poor artisans and peasants, defined themselves as a unity. The contrast between the slave and the citizen made it possible to shade, from an ideological point of view, the relations of exploitation and the differences of wealth between the citizens. This tended to suppress the social conflict between them. Despite the significant legal and political differences between the free and the enslaved, and the ideological representation that was made of it, the sources narrate that some free men not only did not repress the rebel slaves in the great servile revolts, in solidarity with their rich fellow citizens, but they plundered these last ones or joined the fugitives. In the present work, we study the participation of impoverished free men (aporoi) in the laterepublican servile wars and the relationship they established with the rebel slaves, a problem that has sometimes been neglected by the historiography or only partially treated. Some historiographical currents neglected the participation of the aporoi in the servile wars, and others overestimate it. In opposition, we revalue a line of investigation that, on the one hand, maintains the servile nature of the insurrections, since, the main role was apparently of the rebel slaves, but on the other hand affirms that the participation of free men was an important element. We believe that this point of view is the most appropriate for the testimonies of the sources and we contribute elements to rethink it. Those elements include: to focus the study within the framework of the classic democratic imaginary that will tend to promote the citizen solidarity facing the servile threat; to analyse each revolt individually to evaluate the relationship between the subaltern sectors; and understand the participation of the aporoi, either its parallel rebellion or its inflow to the rebel ranks, as the symptom of tensions within the citizen body that can be defined in terms of stáseis (civil discords), of which the servile revolts nurtured from the beginning. Therefore, the participation of the aporoi is a factor, among others, that helped the growth of the servile revolts. In the case of the first Sicilian revolt and the revolt of Spartacus, we maintain the existence of a conjunctural alliance between the rebellious slaves and the aporoi. In contrast, in the second Sicilian revolt, we defend the interpretative line that supports the idea that there was no relationship between the two groups, but rather two parallel revolts: the free poor simply took advantage of the opportunity in the servile revolt to plunder the properties of the rich. Our work attempts to nuance the most rigid theoretical views that affirm the absolute incommunicability between plebeians and slaves. There were occasions, albeit unusual, where the abyss that separated the free man from the slave did not seem to be so great, at least not to the aporoi, who ignored the imaginary that pitted them against the dishonored social dead. The servile wars were one of those cases.Fil: Piantanida, Fernando Martín. Universite de Bourgogne / Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales.Gonzales, AntonioGarcía Mac Gaw, Carlos Guillermo2018-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoralapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.2735/te.2735.pdfspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/84397info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLP2026-09-24T11:44:23Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jte2735Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412026-09-24 11:44:25.071Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
The participation of the aporoi in the late-republican servile wars and their relationship with the rebel slaves. Dominant ideology, popular praxis and civil discords
title La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
spellingShingle La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
Piantanida, Fernando Martín
Historia
Servile wars
Rebel slaves
The impoverished free men
Participation
Ideology
Civil discords
title_short La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
title_full La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
title_fullStr La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
title_full_unstemmed La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
title_sort La participation des aporoi aux guerres serviles sous la République romaine et leur relation avec les esclaves révoltés. Idéologie dominante, praxis populaire et discordes civiles
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Piantanida, Fernando Martín
author Piantanida, Fernando Martín
author_facet Piantanida, Fernando Martín
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gonzales, Antonio
García Mac Gaw, Carlos Guillermo
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Historia
Servile wars
Rebel slaves
The impoverished free men
Participation
Ideology
Civil discords
topic Historia
Servile wars
Rebel slaves
The impoverished free men
Participation
Ideology
Civil discords
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The participation of free men in the movements led by rebellious slaves sets a complex problem in terms of the importance of the freedom/slavery antinomy in the thinking of the ancient Greeks and Romans. The chattelslaves, defined as things, were represented as foreigners. The slaves served as the 'Others' against which all citizens, from the rich slave owners to the poor artisans and peasants, defined themselves as a unity. The contrast between the slave and the citizen made it possible to shade, from an ideological point of view, the relations of exploitation and the differences of wealth between the citizens. This tended to suppress the social conflict between them. Despite the significant legal and political differences between the free and the enslaved, and the ideological representation that was made of it, the sources narrate that some free men not only did not repress the rebel slaves in the great servile revolts, in solidarity with their rich fellow citizens, but they plundered these last ones or joined the fugitives. In the present work, we study the participation of impoverished free men (aporoi) in the laterepublican servile wars and the relationship they established with the rebel slaves, a problem that has sometimes been neglected by the historiography or only partially treated. Some historiographical currents neglected the participation of the aporoi in the servile wars, and others overestimate it. In opposition, we revalue a line of investigation that, on the one hand, maintains the servile nature of the insurrections, since, the main role was apparently of the rebel slaves, but on the other hand affirms that the participation of free men was an important element. We believe that this point of view is the most appropriate for the testimonies of the sources and we contribute elements to rethink it. Those elements include: to focus the study within the framework of the classic democratic imaginary that will tend to promote the citizen solidarity facing the servile threat; to analyse each revolt individually to evaluate the relationship between the subaltern sectors; and understand the participation of the aporoi, either its parallel rebellion or its inflow to the rebel ranks, as the symptom of tensions within the citizen body that can be defined in terms of stáseis (civil discords), of which the servile revolts nurtured from the beginning. Therefore, the participation of the aporoi is a factor, among others, that helped the growth of the servile revolts. In the case of the first Sicilian revolt and the revolt of Spartacus, we maintain the existence of a conjunctural alliance between the rebellious slaves and the aporoi. In contrast, in the second Sicilian revolt, we defend the interpretative line that supports the idea that there was no relationship between the two groups, but rather two parallel revolts: the free poor simply took advantage of the opportunity in the servile revolt to plunder the properties of the rich. Our work attempts to nuance the most rigid theoretical views that affirm the absolute incommunicability between plebeians and slaves. There were occasions, albeit unusual, where the abyss that separated the free man from the slave did not seem to be so great, at least not to the aporoi, who ignored the imaginary that pitted them against the dishonored social dead. The servile wars were one of those cases.
Fil: Piantanida, Fernando Martín. Universite de Bourgogne / Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales.
description The participation of free men in the movements led by rebellious slaves sets a complex problem in terms of the importance of the freedom/slavery antinomy in the thinking of the ancient Greeks and Romans. The chattelslaves, defined as things, were represented as foreigners. The slaves served as the 'Others' against which all citizens, from the rich slave owners to the poor artisans and peasants, defined themselves as a unity. The contrast between the slave and the citizen made it possible to shade, from an ideological point of view, the relations of exploitation and the differences of wealth between the citizens. This tended to suppress the social conflict between them. Despite the significant legal and political differences between the free and the enslaved, and the ideological representation that was made of it, the sources narrate that some free men not only did not repress the rebel slaves in the great servile revolts, in solidarity with their rich fellow citizens, but they plundered these last ones or joined the fugitives. In the present work, we study the participation of impoverished free men (aporoi) in the laterepublican servile wars and the relationship they established with the rebel slaves, a problem that has sometimes been neglected by the historiography or only partially treated. Some historiographical currents neglected the participation of the aporoi in the servile wars, and others overestimate it. In opposition, we revalue a line of investigation that, on the one hand, maintains the servile nature of the insurrections, since, the main role was apparently of the rebel slaves, but on the other hand affirms that the participation of free men was an important element. We believe that this point of view is the most appropriate for the testimonies of the sources and we contribute elements to rethink it. Those elements include: to focus the study within the framework of the classic democratic imaginary that will tend to promote the citizen solidarity facing the servile threat; to analyse each revolt individually to evaluate the relationship between the subaltern sectors; and understand the participation of the aporoi, either its parallel rebellion or its inflow to the rebel ranks, as the symptom of tensions within the citizen body that can be defined in terms of stáseis (civil discords), of which the servile revolts nurtured from the beginning. Therefore, the participation of the aporoi is a factor, among others, that helped the growth of the servile revolts. In the case of the first Sicilian revolt and the revolt of Spartacus, we maintain the existence of a conjunctural alliance between the rebellious slaves and the aporoi. In contrast, in the second Sicilian revolt, we defend the interpretative line that supports the idea that there was no relationship between the two groups, but rather two parallel revolts: the free poor simply took advantage of the opportunity in the servile revolt to plunder the properties of the rich. Our work attempts to nuance the most rigid theoretical views that affirm the absolute incommunicability between plebeians and slaves. There were occasions, albeit unusual, where the abyss that separated the free man from the slave did not seem to be so great, at least not to the aporoi, who ignored the imaginary that pitted them against the dishonored social dead. The servile wars were one of those cases.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
info:ar-repo/semantics/tesisDoctoral
format doctoralThesis
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.2735/te.2735.pdf
url https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.2735/te.2735.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/84397
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
collection Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
repository.mail.fl_str_mv memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1877227784812625920
score 13.265058

Publicaciones similares