Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks

Autores
Arismendy Pabón, Ana María; Felissia, Fernando Esteban; Mendieta, Carolina Mónica; Chamorro, Ester Ramona; Area, María Cristina
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influence of particle size was evaluated in the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated milled and unmilled husk. Subsequently, the efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1181 (SC 1181) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1507 (SC 1507) yeasts were compared using the SSF process. Finally, the SSF and SHF processes were compared using the SC 1181 yeast. Although a little more glucose was generated using ground husk (36.6% vs. 35.5%), grinding costs have to be also considered. The SC1507 yeast performed best at all times. The bioethanol yields for SHF and SSF with SC 1181 were of 35.3% and 38.2%, respectively. Maximum yields in SSF were of 43.9% for SC 1507 and 38%for SC 1181.
Fil: Mendieta, Carolina Mónica. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Felissia, Fernando Esteban. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Area, María Cristina. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Chamorro, Ester Ramona. Instituto de Modelado e Innovación Tecnológica (IMIT). UTN-CONICET. Centro de Investigación en Química Orgánica Biológica; Argentina.
Fil: Arismendy Pabón, Ana María. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM); Argentina.
Peer Reviewed
Materia
rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
2021-04-19T14:50:45Z
Repositorio
Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
Institución
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
OAI Identificador
oai:ria.utn.edu.ar:20.500.12272/4977
Acceder
id RIAUTN_8455ca76b8f7f15cd52854b2f3af14d4
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.utn.edu.ar:20.500.12272/4977
network_acronym_str RIAUTN
repository_id_str a
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
spelling Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husksArismendy Pabón, Ana MaríaFelissia, Fernando EstebanMendieta, Carolina MónicaChamorro, Ester RamonaArea, María Cristinarice husksimultaneous hydrolysis and fermentationhydrolysis followed by fermentationyeastyieldsThis work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influence of particle size was evaluated in the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated milled and unmilled husk. Subsequently, the efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1181 (SC 1181) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1507 (SC 1507) yeasts were compared using the SSF process. Finally, the SSF and SHF processes were compared using the SC 1181 yeast. Although a little more glucose was generated using ground husk (36.6% vs. 35.5%), grinding costs have to be also considered. The SC1507 yeast performed best at all times. The bioethanol yields for SHF and SSF with SC 1181 were of 35.3% and 38.2%, respectively. Maximum yields in SSF were of 43.9% for SC 1507 and 38%for SC 1181.Fil: Mendieta, Carolina Mónica. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.Fil: Felissia, Fernando Esteban. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.Fil: Area, María Cristina. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.Fil: Chamorro, Ester Ramona. Instituto de Modelado e Innovación Tecnológica (IMIT). UTN-CONICET. Centro de Investigación en Química Orgánica Biológica; Argentina.Fil: Arismendy Pabón, Ana María. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM); Argentina.Peer Reviewed2021-04-19T14:50:45Z2021-04-19T14:50:45Z2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/4977https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.68enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-04-19T14:50:45Zhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 InternacionalAcceso Abiertoreponame:Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)instname:Universidad Tecnológica Nacional2026-09-24T12:44:13Zoai:ria.utn.edu.ar:20.500.12272/4977instacron:UTNInstitucionalhttp://ria.utn.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://ria.utn.edu.ar/oaigestionria@rec.utn.edu.ar; fsuarez@rec.utn.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:a2026-09-24 12:44:14.755Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN) - Universidad Tecnológica Nacionalfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
spellingShingle Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
title_short Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_full Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_fullStr Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_sort Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
author Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
author_facet Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
author_role author
author2 Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
topic rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influence of particle size was evaluated in the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated milled and unmilled husk. Subsequently, the efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1181 (SC 1181) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1507 (SC 1507) yeasts were compared using the SSF process. Finally, the SSF and SHF processes were compared using the SC 1181 yeast. Although a little more glucose was generated using ground husk (36.6% vs. 35.5%), grinding costs have to be also considered. The SC1507 yeast performed best at all times. The bioethanol yields for SHF and SSF with SC 1181 were of 35.3% and 38.2%, respectively. Maximum yields in SSF were of 43.9% for SC 1507 and 38%for SC 1181.
Fil: Mendieta, Carolina Mónica. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Felissia, Fernando Esteban. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Area, María Cristina. CONICET. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales (FCEQyN). Instituto de Materiales de Misiones. Programa de Celulosa y Papel (PROCYP); Argentina.
Fil: Chamorro, Ester Ramona. Instituto de Modelado e Innovación Tecnológica (IMIT). UTN-CONICET. Centro de Investigación en Química Orgánica Biológica; Argentina.
Fil: Arismendy Pabón, Ana María. Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM); Argentina.
Peer Reviewed
description This work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influence of particle size was evaluated in the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated milled and unmilled husk. Subsequently, the efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1181 (SC 1181) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1507 (SC 1507) yeasts were compared using the SSF process. Finally, the SSF and SHF processes were compared using the SC 1181 yeast. Although a little more glucose was generated using ground husk (36.6% vs. 35.5%), grinding costs have to be also considered. The SC1507 yeast performed best at all times. The bioethanol yields for SHF and SSF with SC 1181 were of 35.3% and 38.2%, respectively. Maximum yields in SSF were of 43.9% for SC 1507 and 38%for SC 1181.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07
2021-04-19T14:50:45Z
2021-04-19T14:50:45Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/4977
https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.68
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/4977
https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.68
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
2021-04-19T14:50:45Z
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
Acceso Abierto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv 2021-04-19T14:50:45Z
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
Acceso Abierto
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
instname:Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
collection Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
instname_str Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN) - Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gestionria@rec.utn.edu.ar; fsuarez@rec.utn.edu.ar
_version_ 1877230874626359296
score 13.24418

Publicaciones similares